It was some years ago since I last took a psychology class about 2005 but I often think about the concepts of the various schools of psychological thought and being a person who likes clear classification and identification have been wanting to verify a precise label as to what I am in psychological politics/creed spectrum.
So after years of meditation on this issue and much discussion with friends and associates I have a name for my theory of psychology
Neuro-Cognitive Humanistic Behavioralism
It is if you can't tell broken down into 4 previously existing theories of psychology and I'll explain to what extent each part plays in the whole of my concept
Part I Neurological Psychology
A) Dopamine Theory of Schizophrenia supporting the primary issue of schizophrenia is biologically treatable with medication but also that a balance is needed to keep from a contriving a mental illness Parkinson's Disease from an opposite situation of dopamine
B) Serotonin Theory of Elation supporting the concept that pleasure is strongly physiological explaining why what is pleasure is strongly universal and pleasure being drug oriented and caused by various forms of mental/neurological oriented behavior
Part II Cognitive Psychology
A) Beck's Negative Cognitive Triad supporting depression comes from a circular self-defeating logic rooted in doubts of self, society and future
B) Piaget's Stages Of Cognitive Development supporting humans go through stages of intellectual understanding and sound reasoning although no two people grow at the same rate cognitively
Part III Humanistic Psychology
A) Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs supporting the concept that people grow toward a less hedonistic and highly evolved form of pleasure
B) Client Centered Therapy supporting the concept of friendly assistance in a supportive atmosphere provides the best probability of helping those in need (within the reasonableness that the client wants to truly improve)
Part IV Behavioral Psychology
A) Pavlovian Effect supporting that conditioning one variable to be related to a seemingly unrelated other variable causes an otherwise inexplicable connection to be formed with the two variables by the observer of the two variables
B) Conditional Reinforcement supporting the concept that one learns what is good and bad social behaviors by authoritarian assistance via parent, police, teacher etc showing more sophisticated and moral forms of behavior leading to more significant forms of happiness helping them achieve the humanistic view of self-actualization
These theories combined explains social order, morality and pleasure in the best way intellectually possible in my very humbled opinion as I am by no means an expert in these areas but take an avid interest in these and hope to be a cause to a higher understanding of these issues
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment